Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, it is against the Defendants for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are both prone dunes and prone dunes.

Defendant

B was well aware of the password of the entrance door from the "E" photographer operated by the victim D in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and the third floor for about four months.

The Defendants were willing to enter the password of the above entrance in order to reduce living costs, and to intrude into the above entrance, and to steal the property.

On December 8, 2012, at around 01:11, the Defendants came to the above “E” photographic office, and Defendant B divided the password of the entrance and cancelled the correction device, and upon intrusion into the entrance, the Defendants came to have KRW 600,000,000,000 in cash at a simple credit cooperative, the market value of which is equivalent to KRW 60,000,000,000,000,000 won.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (CCTV investigation, securing the suspect's appearance), investigation report (investigation, etc. centered on damaged goods), and (Report on the investigation (information on the results of fingerprint appraisal) - Confirmation of personal information on larceny cases);

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act, which provides for the suspension of execution (including the fact that the accused is against the confession of the crime in this case);