All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

On May 11, 2013, the Defendant is proceeding ahead of the charge by negligence in the same direction as math, while driving a scar in B low-speed vehicle on May 22:30, 2013 and driving a road in the direction of the sathic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic eth

The part of the victim C (ma, 38 years old) driving on the right side of the road with the speed lowered, or the part behind the left side of the vehicle was received as the front part of the vehicle driving.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the escape certificate of a conical signboard that requires medical treatment for about four weeks, and at the same time damaged vehicles to be damaged by the repair cost of KRW 6,059,90.

Reasons for dismissing public prosecution

1. Crimes of non-compliance (main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents);

2. Expression of intention not to punish the victim after the prosecution of this case is instituted;

3. Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act);