1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:

(a) specify the real estate listed in the Schedule;

(b) 4,900,000 won and from June 11, 2019.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 12, 2018, the Plaintiffs and the Defendant concluded a lease agreement with regard to the real estate (hereinafter “instant apartment”) listed in the attached list owned by the Plaintiffs, setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 5,00,000, monthly rent of KRW 650,000 (monthly 10, follow-up) and the lease term of KRW 2 years from May 10, 2018, and at least two months from May 10, 2018.

B. The Defendant: (a) KRW 650,000 on June 7, 2018 to the Plaintiffs;

8.650,000 won;

9.6. 6.50,000 won, 650,000 won on July 6, 190, 200 won on June 22, 201, 200,000 won on June 22, 2019;

1. Only the monthly rent of KRW 3,50,000, including KRW 100,000, was paid for the monthly rent of KRW 3,550,000, and KRW 4,900,000 among the monthly rent until June 10, 2019 and KRW 735,200 are in arrears.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 8, purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the allegations and the above findings, the instant lease agreement was terminated on May 3, 2019, on which the duplicate of the instant complaint was served to the Defendant on the unpaid monthly rent for at least two years.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to order the plaintiffs to restore the apartment of this case to its original state, and to pay the amount calculated by the ratio of KRW 650,000 per month from June 11, 2019 to the completion of lighting.

Although the defendant asserts that since the contract is renewed by oral and written statements around December 24, 2018, it is difficult to accept the plaintiff's request for explanation, it is difficult to recognize it.

3. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, on the ground that the plaintiffs' claim of this case is reasonable.