logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.07.21 2017고정260
폭행등
Text

All prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. Defendant A1) The Defendant used assault around July 29, 2016, 21:50 on the 240 Olympic Games, Songpa-gu, Songpa-gu, Seoul, for the 20th century, and the Defendant was shotbling with B before the Defendant’s play facilities, and the victim D (35 tax), E, and F were shoted.

I think of the fact that the defendant was a mutual vision, and the defendant assaulted the victim's chest by making two descendants one time.

2) At the same time, at the same time, at the same place as above 1-A, the Defendant expressed the victim E, the victim F, and the victim’s vision for the same reason as above 1-A, and expressed the victim E “Chewing years, sick,” and expressed the victim F’s desire to “the victim F,” and publicly insult the victims.

B. Defendant B (1) The Defendant committed assault on the same date, time, and place as the above A. (1) and on the same grounds as the above A. (1) and on the same grounds as the victim E and Si reserve, and assaulted the mother and child of the victim one time by hand.

2) On the grounds of the foregoing paragraph (a)(1) at the same time, at the same time, and at the same place as the above paragraph (a)(1), the Defendant expressed the victim E, the victim F, and several people have been heard, that “for this year,” and the victim F, expressed the victim E “the term of this year,” and made the victim F’s desire to “the year,” etc. to publicly insult the victims.

2. Each of the facts charged as stated in Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act is an offense falling under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act, and the facts charged as stated in Article 1-1(a) and (b) and (1) of the same Act cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the same Act, and each of the facts charged as stated in Article 1-1(a) and (b)-2 is an offense falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act and can be prosecuted only upon the victim’s complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.

However, on June 20, 2017, after the prosecution of this case was instituted, the court of this case, the victim E, and F withdraw each complaint against the Defendants, and the victim D against the Defendant, and the victim E against the Defendant B.

arrow