The judgment below

Of them, the part on Defendant B shall be reversed.

Defendant

B A person shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Defendant of the Prosecutor.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of Defendant B (one year of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. The lower court’s sentence against the Defendant A, C, and D (the suspended sentence of a fine of three million won, the suspended sentence of a fine of three million won, the Defendant C, and D: each of six months of imprisonment and the suspended sentence of a year of suspension of qualification) is too unfluent and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant’s assertion regarding Defendant B seems to have no awareness of an offense in relation to abortion in that: (a) the Defendant was born twice or more, and accused A in relation to abortion with a view to retaliationing A, and received money under the pretext of agreement from C and D for the purpose of retaliationing A.

In addition, the defendant has forged documents under the name of another person several times and opened a mobile phone, which caused the victims to suffer long-term pain, such as bad credit standing.

However, considering the fact that the Defendant appears to have led to the confession of the crime and divided the mistake, there is no particular criminal punishment against the Defendant, and the fact that the court below paid the mobile phone price and the communication fee of the victims of the fraud at the court below, the fact that the victim of the fraud and the private document was additionally agreed with W in the trial at the court below, and the circumstances of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, the age of the Defendant, and the circumstances of various sentencing indicated in the record, such as the Defendant’s sexual conduct, it is unfair that

B. The prosecutor’s life judgment on the prosecutor’s assertion should be respected from the moment of excessive neglect, and the abortion is an offense where the life of a writing is visible.

Defendant

A, C, and D's crime quality is less than those of the other.

It is the reason why it can not be seen.

In addition, the defendant A was born three times or more.

However, there is no criminal history that Defendants A and C have led to the confession of crimes and their mistake in depth, and Defendant D has been punished once by a fine due to drinking alcohol driving.