logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2018.02.14 2017고단1513
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who carries out the delivery of goods and the incineration of waste goods in Echeon-si Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”).

On May 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 16:49, posted waste and wood in a drum box in a drum box; and (b) did not confirm that the drums were properly cut out.

Around that time due to the foregoing occupational division, the Defendant: (a) moved a sect remaining in the drums around that time; (b) had the sected parts of the steel structure in the said drums; and (c) had the sected parts of the roof of the asbestos slate around the said drums.

Ultimately, the Defendant destroyed the roof of timber, steel structure, and housing slate in the market price by negligence in the above business.

2. On May 30, 2017, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) conducted an on-site investigation of the fire site C on fire site; (b) and (c) used the “F” resident registration number of his pro-friendly E as if he were his resident registration number; and (d) used another person’s resident registration number unlawfully, to the Inspector D of the Leecheon Police Station, which verified the Defendant’s personal information on the fire site.

3. On June 17, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received the interrogation of a suspect from the Leecheon-si Police Station investigation and G office in Leecheon-si, Leecheon-si, 32, due to the crime of occupational deterioration; (b) as if he was the Defendant’s pro-friendly E; (c) signed the E in the column of a person who made a statement in the interrogation of a suspect; and (d) delivered the Ha, the police station affiliated with the Leecheon-do Police Station, as if the signature of the said E was duly formed.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged E’s signature for the purpose of exercising, and used forged signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. A report on the occurrence of a loss;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to fire site surveys;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 171 and 170(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts (the point of loss of business, etc.)

arrow