logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.02.05 2015나25756
건물인도 등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of this court concerning the instant case as to the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: the Defendant’s “Defendant” among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance is as “Defendant”; the Defendants, according to the fact of the above recognition, pursuant to the fact of the judgment of the court of first instance 3, “the Plaintiff was terminated on November 2014, as the instant lease contract between the Plaintiff and the o-development was terminated by the Plaintiff’s declaration of intent to terminate the contract; barring any special circumstances, the Defendant, a sub-lessee, as the Plaintiff, was changed to the Plaintiff; and the third party’s “joint deletion” is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow