1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the part pertaining to the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is cited in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the addition of the judgment of the defendant to the following paragraph (2). Thus, it is consistent with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The third sentence of the first instance judgment "9,207,00 won and above" shall be added to the following:

The third party decision of the court of first instance refers to the third party decision of the court of first instance as "progresponding".

Under the third sentence of the first instance court, the third sentence "comfort" shall be read as "comfort".

2. As the Defendant, a shareholder representative suit, belongs to C rather than the Defendant, which is a shareholder representative suit, and thus, the instant lawsuit filed against the Defendant is unlawful.

In the lawsuit for performance, the defendant's standing is recognized to be a person designated by the plaintiff as having a duty to perform the subject matter of a lawsuit, and whether or not there is a duty to perform is a matter to be proved through the deliberation of the merits. Therefore, the defendant's main defense of safety is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.