beta
Text
1. The Defendants each indicated in the Appendix 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 15, 16, 11, 12, 13, 14, 14, among the size of 248 square meters X 248 square meters in Gyeonggi-do.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. 1) The registration relationship of the instant real estate is Y, Z, AA, AB, Defendant H, J, K, L, M, M, N,O, P, Q, R, and the instant real estate: X-type 248 square meters (hereinafter “instant real estate”).
(1) A co-owner’s co-owner’s co-owner’s share 1 Y64/2,898 Y64/2,898 9 Defendant L 42/2,898 Z 168/2,898 10 Defendant M& 42/2,898 3 AA 138/2,898 4 AB 138/2,898 4 AB 138/2,898 4 AB 138/2,898 12, PP 84/2,898 5, H64/2,898 13, P2,898 92/2,898 2,892/2,898 7, 42/2,898 7, 898, 982/2, 982, 982, 898/2, 198
B. 1) The deceased AC’s possession relation to the instant real estate is as follows: (a) the part (i) of the instant real estate connected in sequence 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 15, 16, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 1 of the attached drawings among the instant real estate from around 1940; and (b) the part (i) of the instant real estate connected in sequence 201 square meters (hereinafter “instant land occupied”).
(2) On July 3, 1960, the deceased AC reported marriage with the Plaintiff on July 3, 1960, and the Plaintiff A resided in the land occupied by the instant case since that time.
3) The deceased on October 1, 2003, and the rest of the plaintiffs A and their children, who were their spouses, inherited the property of the deceased AC according to the inheritance shares listed in the attached Table 2. [Grounds for recognition] The remainder of the defendants, who did not dispute in the absence of dispute: Gap 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 (each entry including each number, the result of the survey and appraisal by appraiser AD, the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. The possessor of the determination on the cause of the claim is presumed to have occupied in good faith, peace, and public performance with his own will (Article 197(1) of the Civil Act); the starting date of the commencement of the possession shall be determined at the time when the owner can assert the completion of the prescription if the owner is not changed.