beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff indicated on the attached sheet No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, among the land size of 141 square meters (129 square meters on the land register) in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. F was assessed on September 24, 1915 (Seoul, April 24, 1915) G-Jin-gun G-Jinjin 823 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).
B. On March 4, 1929, the previous land was divided into H 784 square meters (2,592 square meters) and the instant real estate (39 square meters on the old land cadastre). The land category of the instant real estate was changed to “road” on the same day.
C. On November 8, 1930 (No. 5 November 8, 1930), the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of F, the family heir of F, and on March 28, 193 (No. 28 March 28, 193), the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of J, the family heir of F, and on November 15, 1984, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the Plaintiff on November 15, 1984.
From February 15, 1984, the Plaintiff cultivated from around 784 square meters and from around 15, 1984, the portion occupied by the Plaintiff was 138 square meters in part of “1” (hereinafter “the part occupied by the Plaintiff”) in the ship connected each point of the attached Table 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 13, 14, 10, 11, 12, and 1. On December 2, 2013, the part occupied by the Plaintiff was packed as concrete for entry into a nearby new apartment construction site.
On the other hand, among the instant real property, indication 13,8 of the remaining three square meters appraisal excluding the Plaintiff’s occupied portion
9. The portion of the ship used as “the part, hereinafter referred to as “the part,” which connects each point in sequence of 14 and 13.
E) At the same time, the above J died on or around February 25, 1992. At the time of death, Defendant C, C, D, and M, the inheritor, who was the inheritor, died on February 8, 1996. While M was unmarried, M died on or around February 8, 1996. [In the absence of dispute, the grounds for recognition: (a) evidence No. 3-1 through 3, evidence No. 5, evidence No. 5, evidence No. 6, evidence No. 9-1 through 5, evidence No. 9-1, No. 12-2, evidence No. 1, No. 12-2, evidence No. 2-1, and No. 2-2, respectively; and (b) this Court.