1. The Defendant terminates the title trust from the Plaintiff on October 20, 2018 on the motor vehicle indicated in the separate sheet.

1. Indication of claims: It shall be as shown in attached Form; and

2. Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

3. Part of partial dismissal.

A. The Plaintiff asserts that the termination date of the title trust on the instant motor vehicle is March 2, 2009. However, the evidence submitted alone is insufficient to recognize that the title trust was terminated on the above date.

However, since the plaintiff's declaration of intent to terminate the title trust is stated in the complaint of this case, the delivery date of the copy of the complaint of this case is regarded as the date of termination of title trust

B. The Plaintiff asserts that the Defendant is liable to pay damages for delay on the above amount, since the Plaintiff imposed KRW 4,301,780, such as fine for negligence and penalty, due to the occurrence of the operation of the vehicle indicated in the attached Form.

However, even according to the plaintiff's assertion, it is not sufficient to recognize that the plaintiff paid the above KRW 4,301,780 on the sole basis of the submitted evidence alone.

Therefore, we cannot accept the plaintiff's claim for damages for delay.