A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 6, 2012, at around 03:30, the Defendant driven a car in the Coldo with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.130% in the section near bus stops located in front of the bus stops located in the new village of the same 1065-32 on the same day from the Do near the street of the private teaching institute located in the village of the Dong-dong of the same 103:32 on the same day.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (U.S.) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) are those who are engaged in driving a car on the above leth cities.

On July 6, 2012, at around 03:31, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, driven the said car and driven the four-lane road of the distance of driving a driving school and driving a four-lane of the distance of driving a driving school that is located in the normal village of the Gu at Ansan at the same time as above, at the speed of about 30km from the surface of the normal village driving school to the direction of the air at the speed of 30km.

However, as an intersection where signal lights are installed, at the time, at night and at the time, the front door of the road was flowed. As such, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle, has a duty of care to operate the direction, etc. when changing the vehicle, give notice of change of course, and take into account the traffic conditions before, after, after and after the change of the vehicle, and to change the vehicle line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and received the front part of the victim D's D's driving E, which was proceeding at a speed of 50 km from the left side of the vehicle of the Defendant due to the negligence in the course of business that changed the car line to the left side, from the two-lanes on the left side of the vehicle of the Defendant, as the back part of the passenger vehicle operated by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, destroyed the said taxi to be repaired by approximately KRW 3,446,366, such as exchange, maintenance, etc., and immediately stopped to rescue the victim.