logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.02.09 2016고정1242
실화
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 24, 2015, around 08:40 on December 24, 2015, the Defendants left the marries adjacent to E’s inventory storage located in Namyang-si, and Defendant A left the mar in around 09:00 on the same day without taking such measures, left the marb in order to melt the body, and Defendant B entered the mar in the marb as it was left from the mar to the marb.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to put a fire from the fire remaining in shots around that time to the outer wall of the inventory warehouse, and subsequently, caused public danger, such as setting fire by setting fire to three boxes of warehouse buildings in an amount equivalent to KRW 250 million in the market price, by making the Defendants move to the G warehouse owned by neighboring victim F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A report on internal investigation (a CCTV analysis installed at the scene), and a receipt of the results of fire identification;

1. Application of CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 170(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: (a) conciliation has been completed in a civil suit related to the fire of this case for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; (b) the victim appears to be able to recover damage through compulsory execution, such as payment of the amount of damage according to the above conciliation protocol or conversion of the provisional seizure existing under the above conciliation protocol into the seizure, etc.; (c) the Defendants have no criminal record of the same kind; and (d) the circumstances leading to the instant case and progress

arrow