logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2020.10.27 2019나16291
가등기에 기한 소유권이전등기
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

Claim:

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, it is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of

The third written judgment of the first instance court "43 million won" in the second written judgment of the court of first instance shall be 60 million won "60,000 won".

No. 6 of the first instance judgment of the first instance court shall be construed as "No. 9", and "this court" shall be construed as "No. 9", and "No. 1" shall be construed as "No. 1."

The 4th to 19th parallels in the first instance judgment shall be followed as follows.

The Plaintiff or G remitted KRW 60,000,000 to the F’s account on November 5, 2012, KRW 10,000,00, KRW 43,000 on November 20, 2012, and KRW 60,000,000 on November 21, 2012. The Plaintiff asserts that the aforementioned KRW 60,000,000 and KRW 5,000 on the Plaintiff’s loan to the F were the total amount of KRW 5,00,000, KRW 00, KRW 100 on the loan to the Plaintiff’s account and KRW 5,000 on KRW 10 on November 19, 2012, KRW 10 on the loan agreement of KRW 10,000 on KRW 5,00 on the loan agreement, KRW 00 on KRW 00,00 on the loan agreement, as otherwise alleged by the Plaintiff.

The fifth 8-9 of the first instance judgment “this case’s provisional registration is not consistent with the Defendant’s assertion that it is a provisional registration for the purpose of security” is natural to view that “this case’s provisional registration is not consistent with the Defendant’s assertion that it is a provisional registration for the purpose of security.”

On the other hand, the defendant shall pay interest on the borrowed money.

arrow