logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2020.10.14 2019나13131
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The quoted trial of the first instance court was closely examined the allegations of the parties concerned and the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the first instance court, but it does not seem that there was any error in fact-finding and judgment of the first instance court.

Therefore, the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Therefore, it is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act as it is.

The statement of No. 3 of the first instance judgment No. 18 of the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be written with "written evidence No. 3 of the A" as "written evidence No. 3 and No. 16".

The statement of No. 4 of the first instance judgment No. 4 of the 16th sentence "A" shall be written with "each statement of No. 4, 15, 16 of the A".

The first instance judgment No. 18 of the first instance judgment stated "no evidence exists" as "no evidence (in accordance with the statement No. 15 of the Plaintiff's left-hand satis, the Plaintiff's satissatisfy was generated after the Defendant's assault on May 31, 2017 (which was not asserted as the cause of the instant claim)."

The fifth sentence of the first instance judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter referred to as "this judgment") shall be applied to "the first instance judgment".

2. In conclusion, the conclusion of the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow