Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who cultivates crops by using soft facilities in Y, C, D, and E, and F is a representative director of H, a corporation established for the purpose of producing and selling the re-production of agricultural temperature in Y in Y in Y, and I works for H, a corporation, and is in charge of the work of construction contracts for the farmers.

The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry established a 50% of the total project cost when farmers have paid 50% of the total project cost (hereinafter “self-charges”) when farmers have installed a wacker for a facility for the summering (hereinafter “self-charges”) as one of energy use efficiency projects since 2012, the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry implemented a project to support the installation of energy saving facilities that provide the remainder of 50% with national expenses, Do expenses, Si expenses, etc.

Although Defendant, F, and I agreed not to bear the burden of a person to be borne by Defendant who is a subsidized project operator, they would make a false statement of financial transactions, estimates, etc. as if the Defendant paid the full amount of the self-charge, and would obtain the amount of the subsidy from the victim editorial city.

Around May 2012, the Defendant, in collaboration with F and I, submitted a false statement of financial transaction and a written estimate to the Cheong-si, on the following grounds: (a) even though the Defendant concluded a construction contract that he/she would pay the full amount of his/her own contributions at H, and the Defendant would not bear his/her own contributions at all; (b) the Defendant submitted a false statement of financial transaction and a written estimate to the Cheong-si, stating as if the Defendant paid the full amount of the subsidies (31,200,000,000, and KRW 40,966,580,000,000).

However, in fact, even if there was no person who actually borne by the defendant, it was made a false financial transaction statement to pretend that the defendant bears the total amount of the project cost.

As such, the Defendant jointly with F and I, and with the public official belonging to the Office in charge of the Administration around August 2012, 2012, calculated false financial transaction statements, estimates, and tax invoices.