logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2017.05.19 2015고정137
사기등
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person who cultivates crops by using hybrid facilities in Y in YYA, D is a contractor who operates a farming material room or a sub-contractor with the agricultural materials “F” in YUE, and G is a representative of the above company under the name of the above company, and is engaged in the business of selling agricultural materials and arranging tax invoices, etc. under the direction of D.

As part of the energy use efficiency project since 2012, the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry established a 50% of the total project cost when farmers pay 50% of the total project cost (hereinafter “self-charges”) as part of the energy use efficiency project. The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry implemented a project to support the installation of energy-saving facilities that subsidize 50% of the remainder as national expenses, Do expenses, Si expenses, Gun expenses, etc.

Defendant D and G do not bear all or part of the amount to be borne by Defendant who is a subsidized business operator, or agreed to bear only part of the amount to be borne by Defendant on the condition of additional construction, but there was a false financial transaction statement, false quotation, etc. as if Defendant paid the full amount of the self-paid charges.

Around July 2012, the Defendant and D and G submitted a financial transaction statement and estimates to the Cheong-si Office, as if the Defendant paid the full amount, even though they conspired to conclude a construction contract that will bear part of the Defendant’s share of the Defendant’s share of the Defendant. However, the Defendant and D and G submitted 24 million won of the total project cost (24 million won of subsidies, 24 million won of self-payment, 24 million won of the Defendant’s share) as if the Defendant paid the full amount.

However, the defendant and D deposited KRW 10 million in the above account in the name of the defendant, after he deposited KRW 30,1120,000 in the above account in the name of the defendant for the defendant's agricultural bank account in Sung-dong, Sung-dong, Busan. Around July 19, 2012, the defendant and D deposited KRW 50,000,000 in the above account with KRW 11.2 million out of the charges.

arrow