The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On March 31, 2013, from around 17:00 to 19:20 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) held the card in the “Dda” room operated by the Defendant in Yangju-si from around 17:0 to around 19:20 of the same day using 52 card in each of E, F, and G, and 7; and (b) aided and aided the “hulule” gambling in a way that the sum of the number of the plaques in the last part, by leaving the card on the floor in line with the same number or the same pattern, a person with the lowest lowest number of the card, in order to assist him/her in gambling.

2. We examine the facts charged in the instant case. Each seizure protocol and G’s statement in the investigation agency as evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case is merely the content that the Defendant seized money, cards, etc. from the Ddade operated by the Defendant. As such, direct evidence as to the facts charged in the instant case is merely a statement in G’s investigation agency.

As to the statement in G’s investigative agency, the Defendant consistently stated that he was unaware of the fact that G, F, and E had no knowledge of gambling from this investigation agency to this court. G is stated in the investigation agency that when he was first investigated, the Defendant did not gambling, and that he was seated on another test. In other words, when he was investigated by the police, the Defendant brought the card to the Defendant, and the Defendant stated that he was a place where he was gambling, and that he was a place where he was gambling, and the card was gambling. At this time, the card was around a multi-face, and the Defendant was unable to be viewed as gambling with the Defendant and the police, and later, it was found that the Defendant and the police did not know of why he was gambling.