logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.11.28 2014고정956
건축법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Violation of the Building Act;

(a) A person who intends to construct or repair a building shall obtain permission from a Metropolitan Autonomous City Mayor, a Special Self-Governing Province Governor, or the head of a Si/Gun

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without permission from around September 2012 to October 2012, 12, 368.03 square meters of the total floor area of H in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, the Defendant 4 households with 123.56 square meters of the above building as 123.56 square meters of the above 123.56 square meters of the building, 4 households with 3 floors of the same area as 4 households, and extended the wall by piling up the boundary wall between each household with a brick, and 2 households with 8 households multi-family houses permitted by installing toilets and kitchens in each room, and creating separate entrances.

(b) Any person who intends to extend a building with a total floor area of at least 85 square meters shall obtain permission from a Metropolitan Autonomous City Mayor, a Special Self-Governing Province Governor, or

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without permission, extended the number of households of 96.22m2 square meters on the rooftop floor of the above paragraph (a) time and place, without permission.

2. A person who intends to build a building, etc. violating the Parking Lot Act shall establish an annexed parking lot so that vehicles may be parked in the number of vehicles prescribed by the related Acts and subordinate statutes;

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not establish an annexed parking lot for five-fifths of the total number of 0.7 units per family necessary for the added seven households while making large repairs and extension of the multi-family house in the same time and place as the above paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the building site inspection table;

1. Article 108 (1), Article 11 (1) of the Building Act, Article 29 (1) 1, Article 19 (1) of the Parking Lot Act, and the selection of fines for each offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

arrow