logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.05.16 2016가단49142
손해배상
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff asserted that: (a) around 12:30 on March 24, 201, the Plaintiff visited the Defendant’s branch office located in Suwon-si and deposited money into the account; and (b) went beyond the front stairs of the door and went beyond each other; and (c) formed a cement slope in front of the front stairs of the said branch office, which was going beyond the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter “instant accident.” The Defendant is obligated to compensate for the Plaintiff’s property damage equivalent to the Plaintiff’s medical expenses and the lost income and to pay consolation money.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence evidence No. 1-17, evidence No. 25, and evidence No. 26-11 of the evidence No. 1-11, the Plaintiff was diagnosed on March 24, 2011, such as “satisfying satisfying satfy on the left side, satisfying sat, inside the left satfy satfy, outside satfy satfy, outside satfy satfy, left satfy satfy, left satum satfy, and left satum satfy sat, etc., and was hospitalized in the hospital until May 6, 2011, and the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the E Hospital after the diagnosis of “satfy satfy, satum - satum sat, satisfy, and sat.”

However, as to whether the above injury occurred due to the accident of this case, each of the items of Gap evidence No. 18, Gap evidence No. 19, and No. 24-1 and No. 2 are contents of the plaintiff's unilateral statement made in around 2014, not later than three years prior to the date of the accident of this case. Thus, it is insufficient to deem that the plaintiff's injury was caused by the accident of this case only with the above evidence, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge

B. Even if the Plaintiff’s assertion is acknowledged, the right to claim for damages arising from a tort is extinguished by prescription unless the victim exercises it for three years from the date the victim became aware of such damage and the perpetrator (Article 766(1) of the Civil Act). The Plaintiff becomes aware of such damage and the perpetrator.

arrow