The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is erroneous in the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged, by misunderstanding the facts, even though the defendant did not inflict an injury on the victim as stated in the facts charged.

2. The judgment of the court below, comprehensively taking account of the various evidences duly adopted and examined, that is, ① the victim has made a relatively consistent and concrete statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court below as to the content of the harm as stated in the facts charged, the part part of the injury, and the degree thereof, ② The witness F also stated from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below that he was guilty of the victim. G at the time was also at the court of the court below that “Although he was unable to directly witness the scene of the assault in the old room, he did not directly have a view to the victim, but he was able to feel that he was able to feel that he was able to be able to be able to be able to be able to have suffered the victim.” The sound alone stated that “The victim was able to have been able to be able to be able to be able to be able to have suffered the injury, such as the victim’s statement and the degree of the injury.”

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.