A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2018. 12. 2. 21:55경 성남시 수정구 B에 있는 ‘C’ 앞 도로에서, ‘사람 2명이 넘어졌다. 주취자 추정, 아픈 데는 없다’는 신고를 받고 출동한 소방대원들에게 수회 욕설을 하고 발길질을 하였고, 이에 성남수정경찰서 D파출소 소속 경찰관인 피해자 E(42세), 피해자 F(24세)이 이를 제지하자 욕설을 하며 손으로 피해자 E를 수회 밀쳐 넘어트린 후 발로 얼굴을 걷어찼고, 피해자 F을 수회 밀쳤다.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers concerning the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes, and at the same time, the Defendant placed the victim E on the left-hand knee and the face-to-face knee in need of treatment for about two weeks, and the victim F on the face of the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the E, F, and G;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the statutes governing police officers' photographs;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of this case with the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act was committed by a fire official and a police officer dispatched by the defendant to rescue the friendship of the defendant who was under the influence of alcohol, obstructing the legitimate execution of duties by exercising violence, and further, causing injury to a police officer, and the nature of the crime is not good.

In addition, the victims did not recover from damage.

However, the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and is in a profound reflection, and the defendant committed the crimes of this case in a state of interest due to the fluoral fluor who was drunk at the time.