beta
Text
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months;
2. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and two months.
(b).
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court on October 8, 2009, and on June 19, 2010, at Seongdong-gu District Court on June 201, 4 times the same kind of force, including the completion of the execution of the sentence.
Defendant
B On July 4, 2013, the same year is subject to a suspended sentence of two years for a year of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. in the assistance of the District Court of Suyang Branch.
7.12 The above judgment became final and conclusive.
【Criminal Facts】
1. The Defendants: (a) purchased an apartment with a former tenant and conspired to acquire a loan to a credit service provider, by preparing and submitting a false document as if there is no former tenant, thereby impairing the security value of an apartment.
Defendant
A around March 2012, with the consent of Defendant C by stating that “A may collect money from a house in the name of D and obtain a loan by drawing it as a security.” On April 16, 2012, Defendant C purchased H apartment 108 Dong 201, 51 million won in the name of Defendant C (the sale price of KRW 170 million - the lease deposit of KRW 119 million in I) in the name of Defendant C and completed the registration of transfer of ownership.
Defendant
B On May 21, 2012, Defendant C directed Defendant C to the effect that “A lending business entity is aware of theme to be the mother, and that there is no tenant if you ask the moving household,” Defendant B and Defendant C, at the “L loan office for the victim’s K operation in Gangnam-gu Seoul on the same day,” Defendant B and Defendant C prepared and issued a letter of commitment that “A would have to offer and borrow an apartment of this mother C as security, because there is no tenant and no defect,” and Defendant C did not have any tenant in the above apartment.
However, in fact, the above apartment house is owned by a person with total revenues of KRW 119 million as the deposit for the lease on a deposit basis, and the defendants also have an amount of KRW 51 million.