logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.05.18 2015고단944
장물취득
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On September 27, 2014, around 10:30, the Defendant, at his own store located on the second floor of the building E in Gwangju-si, purchased stolen goods at KRW 800,000,000, after being aware of the fact that the market price of the victim’s possession, which he stolen from the victims F’s children, was equivalent to KRW 1,00,000, the victim’s own.

B. On October 10, 2014, around 10:00, the Defendant, at his own store located on the second floor 53 of the building E in Gwangju-si, purchased stolen goods at KRW 800,000,000, after being aware of the fact that the Defendant was the victim’s own share of KRW 2,000,000, the victim’s own share of KRW 2,000,000.

(c)

On October 25, 2014, around 10:00, the Defendant acquired stolen goods by purchasing KRW 400,000, even though he/she knew of the fact that the Defendant was a stolen stolen goods, at his/her own store located on the second floor of the E-Si, Gwangju-si, about 53, the second floor of the E-si, the victim F, and the victim’s children, who he/she stolen from his/her son F., the victim’s own market value of KRW 600,000.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired stolen goods by purchasing precious metals, etc. which have been stolen by children of a juvenile victim three times with knowledge that they are stolen.

2. Defendant B is a person who operates H with G 124 of G in Gwangju City.

On November 07, 2014, at around 19:30, the Defendant acquired stolen goods by purchasing KRW 420,000, even though he knows that there is a 600,000 of the market price owned by the victim who was stolen from the children of the victim F, within the “H” store operated by himself on 124 of the first floor of the G building in Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si, and acquired stolen goods by purchasing KRW 420,00,00, even though he knows that there is a 600,000 in the market price owned by the victim who was stolen from the children of the victim F.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each statement of the witness I, J and F in the third public trial records;

1. Each police officer against I and J.

arrow