1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company running an insurance business, such as automobile insurance, and entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with Nonparty A for the period from April 19, 2013 to April 19, 2014 with respect to the instant vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “instant vehicle”), and the Defendant Republic of Korea for the period from November 22, 2012 to May 20, 2014, which was in force on the 29th line of the Kim Jong-Se Road Construction (hereinafter referred to as “instant road construction work”) on the 29th line of the National Road at Kim Jong-si (Sek-Se-Se-Se-Se-Se-Se-Se-Se-Se-Se-Se-Se-Se-Se-S-Se-Se-Se-Se-Se-S-Se-Se-Se-Se-Se-Se-S

B. At around 03:00 on December 28, 2013, Nonparty A driven the instant accident vehicle and operated the national highway No. 609-29 located in the 29th side of the west at Kim Jong-si in the vice bank from the vice bank to the front side of the instant road, where Nonparty A opened to the left side in the instant road section, and he/she again proceeded to the left side of the instant road at the left side of the SS’s hub structure, which he/she again opened to the right side of the instant road, and proceeds without plucking or digging down hand to the right side of the instant road, thereby falling down below the blocking wall installed on the side side of the two-lanes facing the median line.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

On the other hand, the Plaintiff’s comprehensive automobile insurance contract from January 2, 2014 to the same year under the said comprehensive automobile insurance contract.

5. Until June, 16, Nonparty A paid KRW 41,233,490 for medical expenses and the amount agreed upon for the instant accident, and KRW 6,610,00 for the repair cost of the instant vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 2 through 6, 9, 10 evidence, Eul 1 and 2 evidence, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. The plaintiff's assertion is that the "Road Traffic Act implementer" passes through vehicles and horses during construction hours.