1. The Defendant’s KRW 85,105,604 and the said money to the Plaintiff are 5% per annum from June 15, 2015 to November 14, 2018.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

(a) Fact-finding 1) Nonparty C is a DNA car (hereinafter referred to as “accident”) around 07:50 on June 15, 2016, around 07:50.

) A traffic accident that conflicts with the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle that operated the central line near F located in Kim Jong-si, while driving the road No. 29 of the national highway as a brickd section of Kim Jong-si and driving the road to the section of the sub-section office in the area of the sub-section office in Kim Jong-si (hereinafter “instant accident”).

)를 일으켰다. 2) 원고는 이 사건 사고로 우측 대퇴골간의 골절, 우측 무릎뼈의 골절, 우측 족부 리스프랑관절 손상, 우측 엄지 발가락의 골절, 우측 두번째 증족골의 골절, 좌측 이두근 파열, 좌측 안면부, 두부 열상 등의 상해를 입었다.

3) The Defendant is an insurance company that entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with C with respect to the instant vehicle involved. [The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap 1 and 2, and Eul 6-1, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. Under Article 3 (Liability for Damages) of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, Articles 724 (Direct Claim against Insurer) and 726-2 (Liability for Indemnification of Automobile Insurers) of the Commercial Act, the Defendant is liable to compensate for all damages suffered by the Plaintiff due to the instant accident.

2. In principle, the period of calculating the scope of compensation for damage shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 10 shall be discarded;

The current price calculation at the time of the accident shall be based on the calculation of the amount of damages, which deducts interim interest at the rate of 5/12 per month as a simple interest.

It shall be rejected that the parties' arguments are not separately explained.

[Reasons for Recognition] In the absence of a dispute, entry of Gap 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, Eul 1 and 2 (including partial numbers), the result of physical appraisal of the G Hospital Head of this Court, the rule of experience, and the purport of the whole pleadings

(a) Appendix No. 1, except as otherwise stated below.