logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.03.03 2016고단3279
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B: (a) around June 8, 2016, at the Daejeon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon; (b) around 19:30, the Defendant engaged in a similar sexual intercourse, such as having sexual traffic women G receive KRW 40,00 won from customers H and leading them to his/her sexual organ with H with his/her fingers; and (c) from May 6, 2016 to May 7, 2016, and from June 6, 2016 to June 8, 2016, the Defendant arranged sexual traffic by employing employees A, sexual traffic women G, and I to guide them, and by having G and I engage in sexual traffic.

2. Defendant A

A. On June 8, 2016, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Franchising “F” in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, and the second level of B’s operation, and that B had sexual traffic women employed at the Franchising business establishment and had them find the said business establishment receive money from the customers, thereby arranging sexual traffic for the business of arranging sexual traffic. In short, the Defendant was able to facilitate the commission of sexual traffic in B by receiving subscription calls from the said commercial sex business establishment and guiding the men who found at the business establishment.

B. On August 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) placed in the Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, and the Defendant’s operation of the Defendant on the second floor, in four rooms to engage in sexual traffic; (b) placed sexual intercourse with a man in exchange for money from many unspecified men by employing sexual traffic women L, etc.; and (c) arranged sexual intercourse with a man in exchange for money from many unspecified men; and (d) arranged sexual intercourse with a man.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Entry of each statement in the police interrogation protocol with regard to G or I;

1. Each entry in G, I, H, L, and M;

1. Application of each Act or subordinate statute to each protocol of seizure;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant B: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts, and the choice of imprisonment;

B. Defendant A: Punishment of acts, such as arranging sexual traffic.

arrow