A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

On July 21, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with labor due to interference with business affairs at the Busan District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Busan Detention House on March 19, 2017.

1. On April 4, 2018, the Defendant, at around 22:15, 2018, hereinafter “E cafeteria operated by the victim D in Busan Shodong-gu, the Defendant: (a) expressed that the entrance was opened in the manner of drinking; (b) expressed to two female customers, “I am frien, ring,” and expressed to the two male customers, “I am frien,” and “I am frien,” and “I am out of the city, I am spath for about 5 minutes.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant operation by force.

2. On April 4, 2018, the Defendant, at around 23:10 on April 4, 2018, obstructed the victim’s right-hand hand by putting the victim’s neck, as stated above, at the place of the above paragraph 1, and pushed the victim’s right-hand hand.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

3. On April 4, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received the 112 report in front of the exit of 203 5 m3 malonom; and (b) received the 112 report in front of the exit of 203 malonom; and (c) received the H 112 report from the G G malonom of the thought police station.

In other words, the above H was guilty of “I am feasia”;

We see, Doz., Doz., Doz., Doz., spits spite, brine on the face of the H one time while taking the bath as "doz."

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties of police officers on handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to D, H and F;

1. A criminal investigation report (Attachment to suspect-related video CDs), CD images;

1. Previous convictions: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (reficiant confirmation);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for each type of crime;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. Article 37 of the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes Act.