logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.08.14 2018고정611
일반교통방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 25, 2018, from around 13:42 to August 13:45, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the passage of roads for about three minutes, on the ground that he/she was not driving a Trackter, because he/she was parked in front of the Trackcheon-gun B located in Jincheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement made by witnesses E in the third protocol of the trial;

1. On-site photographs, photographs, etc., the defendant's response to the request for investigation cooperation and defense counsel asserted that the defendant's act does not constitute the elements for interference with general traffic, or is not illegal because the defendant's act does not constitute an element for interference with general traffic, nor does it go against social rules, because he/she is found that he/she was left the center of the road because he/she was found to have been illegally parked in the front of the track and could not pass through because he/she had already obstructed traffic.

According to the records of this case, when the defendant driving a Track on the criminal facts stated in the judgment of the court below and arrived at the site of this case, it is recognized that the Track, Scto, and Track was parked in the front of the Tracter, but on the other hand, the following facts or circumstances that can be known by the evidence mentioned above, namely, the defendant, from August 25, 2018 to August 13:20, 2018, he left a Track on the center of the road indicated in the facts of crime, arguing that it cannot pass through a Track because he was parked in about about 20 minutes of drinking, and he was arrested on August 13:45, 2018. According to the defendant's report, the police officer E, etc. dispatched to the above site of around 13:26 of the same day and recommended the borrower to leave the Track in the future, but the defendant did not comply with it.

arrow