1. The Defendant’s KRW 20 million and the Plaintiff’s annual interest from August 9, 2018 to January 10, 2019.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 2, 1995, the plaintiff is legally married between the non-party C and the non-party C, who has three children between the plaintiff and the C.

B. From around 2017, the Defendant maintained a close relationship with C and maintained the relationship with C, while making a trip to Korea or abroad along with golf trading.

C. Around March 2018, the Plaintiff was aware of the relationship between C and the Defendant with C by hearing the contents of telephone conversations between C and the Defendant, and the Defendant opposed to C.

However, the Defendant, while maintaining the relationship with C even thereafter, viewed the motion picture with C on April 5, 2018, and delivered the urban village directly prepared to C on April 9, 2018. On April 22, 2018, the Defendant conducted golf trading together.

C After the discovery of the relationship with the Defendant, C stored the Defendant’s contact address on a cell phone in the name of “D” and provided the Defendant with E message.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 13 (including provisional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

(a) A third party who has a liability for damages shall not interfere with a married couple's communal life falling under the nature of marriage, such as interfering with a married couple's communal life by interfering with another person's communal life;

In principle, a third party's act of infringing on or interfering with a marital life falling under the essence of marriage by committing an unlawful act with either side of the married couple and causing mental pain to the spouse by infringing on the rights of the spouse as the spouse.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2013Meu2441, May 29, 2015). The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence of the preceding vessel, namely, the Defendant committed an unlawful act with C along with C several times of travel, and the Defendant was aware of the relationship with C, and the relationship with C even after the Defendant was clear.