logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.04.12 2017가단525070
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 25,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from July 21, 2017 to April 12, 2018, and the following.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

The plaintiff is a legal couple who completed the marriage report with C on November 28, 2011.

The Defendant entered a hotel, etc. from around April 1, 2017 to May 20, 2017 at a hotel, etc., and took part in the trip from around April 23, 2017 to Busan around May 20, 2017.

On May 29, 2017, the Plaintiff’s female is the Plaintiff’s spouse through SNS, and the Plaintiff and C were pregnant and demanded to cut off the relationship with C by notifying the Plaintiff of the fact that the Plaintiff is pregnant.

C did not return to the home residing with the Plaintiff on June 4, 2017. Since June 2017, C frequently opened the Defendant’s home and received copies of the instant complaint at the Defendant’s domicile on July 20, 2017.

around June 2017, the defendant purchased household and household appliances with C's credit card in a million won, and made a trip with C around July 2017.

In addition, the Defendant submitted to this court a written reply to the effect that “C was liquidated after having become aware that C is a spouse,” while he was living together with C and overseas travel around September 2017 during the instant lawsuit.

On the other hand, the Plaintiff gave birth to C on August 25, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, Eul evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence No. 4-1, 2, Gap evidence Nos. 5, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, and 17 (if there are separate numbers, including each number), the fact inquiry conducted by the head of the Ministry of Justice and the Immigration Office of the Ministry of Justice, and the fact inquiry conducted by the court to the head of the Ministry of Justice and Immigration Office of the Republic of Korea, the third party who has liability for damages as a whole for judgment of the purport of the pleading shall not interfere with the communal life of the married couple, such as causing a failure of the marital community

A third party who commits an unlawful act with either side of the couple, thereby infringing on or impeding the maintenance of a marital life corresponding to the essence of marriage, and infringing on the right as the spouse.

arrow