logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2013.08.09 2013고단1528
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CPcar car.

On January 13, 2013, at around 17:10, the Defendant driven the foregoing vehicle which was not covered by mandatory insurance, and changed the three-lane road in front of the Simco construction site in the Simco zone in Suwon-gu Busan Metropolitan City from the jurisdictional intersection to the horizontal intersection.

In such a case, the defendant, who is engaged in driving duty, has the duty of care to inform the direction change in advance and to prevent accidents by changing the lanes safely in the situation of traffic in the front and rear left.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and instead changed the two lanes from the first lane to the third lane, and received the left-hand part of the victim D(54 years old) driving in front of the right-hand part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

The Defendant, by its occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim D (the 52 years old), such as salt, tension, etc. of the bones of neck, which requires medical treatment for about two weeks, and injury to satis, satis, tension, etc. to the victim F (the 34 years old), which requires medical treatment for about two weeks, and sustained injury to the victim G (the 32 years old), such as satise, tension, tension, etc., requiring medical treatment for about three weeks, while at the same time, destroyed the damaged vehicle to damage KRW 1,142,731, as well as escape without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

Accordingly, while driving a vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance, the Defendant destroyed the victim D's vehicle due to occupational negligence, and at the same time escaped even though the victims suffered injury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement on the occurrence of each traffic accident in D, F and G;

1. Each written diagnosis and written estimate shall be subject to the law.

arrow