1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. (1) On December 8, 2005, the I Housing Redevelopment Project Promotion Committee (hereinafter “instant Promotion Committee”) organized to implement a housing redevelopment project in the area of 91,112 square meters, including the disposition to authorize the establishment of a partnership, etc. (1) The I Housing Redevelopment Promotion Committee (hereinafter “instant Promotion Committee”) held an inaugural general meeting to establish an association on July 5, 2007, upon obtaining approval from the Defendant, and decided on the “case of an implementation plan for a rearrangement project”.

(2) The instant promotion committee applied for authorization to establish the primary association on October 23, 2007 to the Defendant, but returned on May 8, 2008, and applied for authorization to establish the primary association on May 15, 2008 and February 16, 2009, but applied for authorization to establish the primary association on July 10, 2008 and February 27, 2009, respectively, and applied for authorization to establish the primary association on May 26, 2009 (hereinafter “instant association”).

(3) From July 16, 2008, 96 members, including K, submitted a written withdrawal of consent to the instant promotion committee from July 16, 2008 to the date of the instant disposition, and the said promotion committee notified the Defendant. At the time of the instant disposition, the Defendant, among 592 members, 453 consent (ratio 76.52%, small number of fewer than four decimal places) among 592 members except for the owners of land, etc. within the project zone who are not confirmed to be members from 610 members, was included in the number of consenters.

(4) The instant association obtained approval of a project implementation plan from the Defendant on August 1, 2012, and the Plaintiffs, who were members of the subsequent process in the application for parcelling-out, were classified as cash liquidation since they did not apply for parcelling-out.

B. The instant administrative case (1) filed a lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity of the instant disposition, etc. (hereinafter “related administrative case”) against the Defendant and the instant association as the court 2012Guhap4631.