logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원원주지원 2020.11.19 2018가합5641
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 126,962,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from July 21, 2015 to November 19, 2020 for the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a worker employed by the Defendant.

The Defendant is a company that has received and supplied the instant construction work (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction work”) in Chuncheon City C (hereinafter referred to as the “instant building”).

B. On July 21, 2015, around 09:10 on July 21, 2015, the Plaintiff was engaged in the work of installing a crypter between two columns at the instant construction site.

During the period of the Plaintiff’s setting of the clers and separation of the clers and the clers from the clers, the line between the clers was connected to the clers by taking advantage of the clers separate from the clers according to the direction of the Working Group leader, and the line connected to the clers was coming from the clers that the Plaintiff was walking.

As a result, the Plaintiff lost balance and crashed.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident.” The Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as the dule of the instant accident, the dunes of the left-hand slick, the front slick, the left-hand slick, etc.

C. At the time of performing the above work, there was no safety device, such as a safety net, which can prevent the Plaintiff from falling on the ground.

The Plaintiff filed an industrial accident application with the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service for the instant accident, and received respectively KRW 9,877,570 for medical care benefits, KRW 15,616,160 for temporary layoff benefits, and KRW 6,424,00 for disability benefits.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 4, 7, 10, 11, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the fact that the liability for damages was established, the defendant is obligated to install safety devices, such as a safety net for the prevention of fall, in a case where the plaintiff's employer works at a place where workers might fall down as the plaintiff's employer.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not install safety devices, such as a safety net for the prevention of fall, and violated the duty of safety consideration for workers, and this negligence.

arrow