logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.01.19 2015노2739
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment below held that the defendant was suspended three times for a traffic accident-related crime, and was sentenced to the probation for the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in 201, for 8 months of imprisonment, 3 years of probation, protection and observation, and 80 hours of social service due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving), but the probation period has expired and one year has passed, causing the instant accident by driving again at the expiration of the probation period, and 0.134% of alcohol level during blood, and that the defendant agreed with the victims at the trial, and that the defendant is against the crime, and that the victims violated the law, and the favorable sentencing factors such as the victim's age, sexual behavior, and the circumstances after the crime are different from each other, and thus, the defendant's punishment cannot be deemed to have been too unfair and unfair to the extent of imprisonment with prison labor for not less than four months (4 months of sentencing guidelines).

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow