The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the favorable factors such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive for committing the crime, circumstance after committing the crime, etc., and the Defendant’s punishment against the Defendant is too unreasonable, even though he/she had been sentenced to punishment on the criminal facts that include driving without a license and driving without a license, driving without a license, driving without a license, and driving without a license, and driving without a license, etc., and driving under the influence of 0.114% alcohol during blood, driving against the Defendant’s crime, and the favorable sentencing factors such as the Defendant’s support for the aged’s mother, and other factors that form the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the instant records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive for committing the crime, and conditions after committing the crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25 (1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, which adds "1. Selection of Imprisonment for the Sentence 1. Selection of Imprisonment" after "the first regular concurrence" under Article 25 (1).