logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.12.04 2014고단2736
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 29, 2007, the defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch on March 29, 2007, and the summary order of KRW 2.5 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Ansan District Court's Ansan Branch on September 18, 2008.

1. On July 27, 2014, the Defendant, as a person who had a drinking alcohol force twice as above, driven a shower car from around 5 km to the front side of a line apartment located in Ansan-gu, Seosan-gu, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, whose blood alcohol content is 0.192% under the influence of alcohol at around 00:31, July 27, 2014.

2. On July 27, 2014, the Defendant was driving a shower car on the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) around 00:31 on July 27, 2014, and, at the same time, the Defendant continued the four-lane road in front of the Gimul Apartment apartment located in the Sung-gu, Seopo-dong, Seosan-gu, Seosan-dong, with four-lane

At the time, since it is a remote distance where a signal is installed at night and is installed, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to operate the steering direction and system accurately by checking well the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with good faith while maintaining a safe distance with the motor vehicle ahead.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, but found the e-car, which was driven by the victim D (hereinafter referred to as 41 years old) who was stopped in the same direction and stopped in the same direction, and took a sudden action, but did not avoid the e-car, and received the back part of the masawa car as the front part of the Shsawa car.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence on the part of the above occupational negligence caused the injury to the victim D, such as fluoral salt, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, to the victim F.

arrow