Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
At around 14:00 on October 29, 2014, the Defendant, at the front of the Defendant’s operation in the Yongsan-si Metropolitan Area C, had a dispute over E (the age of 31) with the victim E (the age of 30) who was not good for appraisal due to the passenger car parking problem and the telephone prior to this, and therefore, E (the age of 31) with the male-child job victim F (the age of 31).
1. The Defendant, in the above time, at the above place, did not participate in the frying dispute, and at the same time, at E’s maternity G and surrounding merchants, did not want to kill the Victim F, i.e., “I am fright. I will do so. I am frith. I am frith. I am. I may die. Isfrith of governance. I amfrith of governance. I ambrith of governance. I ambrith of am. I ambrith of the Defendant’s head and chest part while threateninging the Victim while threateninging the Victim with the Victim. I ambroth of the Victim.”
Accordingly, the Defendant openly insultingd and abused the victim.
2. The Defendant used assault and insult against the victim E at the above time, at the above location, and at the above time and place, told the victim E that “if parking was immediately made, whether it would not have been done so.” However, the victim E severely expressed her desire to “the victim E, who would have caused the frith of this frith.h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.h.
Accordingly, the Defendant openly insultingd and abused the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Each legal statement of witness F, G, and E;
1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;
1. Application of Fagic Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Article 260 (1) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act and the selection of a fine as to the facts constituting an offense;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The defendant is guilty of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.