The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects it, and the fact that the damaged goods for larceny have been returned to the victim is favorable.

On the other hand, the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime after having been sentenced to punishment for special robbery, including the previous offense committed by theft of another person by means similar to the instant larceny and having been sentenced to punishment; there are many criminal records of larceny; and the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime after having been sentenced to punishment for special robbery; and the blood alcohol concentration is very high to 0.253%.

There is no special relationship or change of circumstances that can be newly considered in the trial of the political party, and in full view of various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.