The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for up to eight months) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment that the Defendant recognized the instant crime, and that the amount of damage caused by fraud or larceny is not relatively large, and that the Defendant paid the victim G and L the amount of damage at the lower court, and agreed that the said victims were not punished by the Defendant, and that the damage was returned to the victim I and L.

On the other hand, there are many criminal convictions, including the Defendant, who were sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment, and the Defendant committed the instant crime, and did not agree with the victim C,O, and I, if he were to commit the instant crime during the period of repeated crime due to fraud similar to the instant fraud.

There is no special relationship or change of circumstances that can be newly considered by this court, and in full view of the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, and various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.