(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.04.26 2018고단343

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.04.26 2018고단343

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a BMF car.

On January 21, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol of 0.134% during blood transfusion 05:55, and proceeded along the four-lanes between the five-lanes on the border road located in the Gyeongnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City) and the two-lanes on the side of the Gyeongnam-si (Seoul Special Metropolitan City).

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle is likely to impede normal traffic of other motor vehicles running in the direction of the change, shall not change course, and he/she has a duty of care to properly see the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to prevent accidents from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, went through two-lanes of the Victim C(41) driving by negligence while neglecting the influence of alcohol and neglecting it, was shocked into the right side part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim C, such as the chilled salt, tension, etc. in need of a two-day medical treatment due to the negligence of driving a motor vehicle while normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, and the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim E (the victim E (the victim E) for about two weeks of light chills, tensions, etc.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) driven BMW car at approximately 15 KK from the front of the mutual influence restaurant located in the Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-do, in the condition of alcohol content of 0.134% among blood transfusions at the time indicated in paragraph (1) to the seat of the same 402K km at the seat of the same Gu-nam-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. (1) (2) The actual survey report, the circumstantial statement report of the driver at the State, and the investigation report (Evidence records.

참조조문

-특정범죄 가중처벌 등에 관한 법률

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2016.08.25 2016고정1620

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.09.19 2018고단4026

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.12.21 2017고단3017

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.06.13 2014고단133

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.03.23 2017고단98