A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2015. 9. 12. 18:20경 인천 남구 B빌라 앞 도로에서, “헤어진 남자친구가 찾아와 무서워서 못나간다”는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 인천남부경찰서 C파출소 소속 순경 D(31세)에게 “니들이 여기 왜 왔냐. 씹할 놈들아. 맞짱 뜰까”라고 욕설을 하면서 손바닥으로 위 D의 목 부위를 2회 때리고 그의 얼굴을 향해 주먹을 휘둘렀고, 위 D로부터 공무집행방해 혐의로 현행범인으로 체포되려 하자 팔꿈치로 그의 얼굴을 1회 때리는 등 폭행하여 경찰관의 112 신고 처리 및 현행범인 체포에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D, E, and F

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] No person who has no basic area (6 to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (decision of sentence] (decision of sentence], the fact that there is no agreement with police officers who have suffered damage, the fact that there is no record of the same kind of power, the fact that there is three times criminal records of fines, the fact that there is no record of the crime, the fact that the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered, and the punishment as ordered shall be determined as per the order.