(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.08.07 2015고단926

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.08.07 2015고단926

공공단체등위탁선거에관한법률위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was a representative of the CF’s member of the PFF, and he was he accumulated with D, the former president of the PFFF. On March 11, 2015, for the purpose of helping D to run for the head of the FFF at the simultaneous election of the head of the FFF at the same time on March 11, 2015.

Accordingly, around 12:00 on February 13, 2015, the Defendant provided D and the association members G, H, and I, who are members of the association, with the equipment, tenant, beer, and beer, etc., and provided D and D may appeal against the said association members, and paid KRW 196,40,00 for meal costs in cash.

Accordingly, the defendant made contributions for the candidate during the contribution-restricted period.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police officer in relation to H;

1. A written answer to G;

1. The accusation, cash receipt, the defendant, and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant was forced to meet or take meals with D and its members, and that there was no intention to help D to run an election campaign for the head of the association.

However, members H suggested that the defendant will take meals while attempting to help the defendant go through the election of the head of the cooperative, and that D complained of support in the restaurant by attempting to get his election. Members G also stated that D was elected from the election during the meal Do, and the defendant did not have a meal meeting in the first place in D, G, H, I, and I before the instant case, the defendant decided that D had no meal meeting.

In addition, when the defendant arranged a meal group with D and its members, it is only one month from the election day of the president of the partnership, and in fact D was elected by going through the election of the president of the partnership.

Act on Entrusted Elections by Public Organizations, etc. shall apply to electors, etc.

참조조문

-공공단체등 위탁선거에 관한 법률

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.08.28 2015고단986

-대구지방법원 상주지원 2014.11.27 2014고합40

-서울고등법원 2014.10.24 2014노1716

-광주지방법원 2015.10.15 2015고단1977

-대구지방법원 2020.09.24 2020가합203613