Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was a person who was a victim B (Divorce with children of the defendant around February 20, 2020).

On February 24, 2020, on the ground that the Defendant does not open a door in front of the victim's house in the Michuhol-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C building D around February 24, 2020, and therefore, on the ground that many and unspecified residents, such as E, residing in neighboring areas, are heard, “it is impossible to keep them up in custody.” On the other hand, the Defendant was unaware of his knowledge of being able to do so.

b) Doing so doing, Doing so, Doing Linger, and Doingle for a year, which was calculated by applying mutatis mutandis the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation and law

In addition, I said that I would like to see the roots, I would like to see it, I would like to see it, and I would like to say that I would have poppy and poppy."

However, the facts did not seem to be the victim, and there was no fact that the victim had poppy poppy or had the child detained.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the Defendant’s partial statement G and B’s investigation report (Evidence List Nos. 15) on each police’s statement protocol against the Defendant, as indicated in the facts charged, is prohibited from giving up “componing difficulties.”

“The (victim)” and “the (victim)” are out of the Republic of Korea.

In addition, the father of the son is also the father of the son.

“Ilves and poppy” and “Ilves and poppy.”

In addition, the following facts are acknowledged: ① at the time, the victim was not inside the body, and the victim’s speech G, which was the victim, did not open a defective door to the effect that the Defendant talked with a large voice outside the body, and she did not release the son, and ② the victim and the son of the Defendant were detained.