The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On June 30, 2016, around 14:00, the Defendant appeared and testified as a witness of the case violating the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint injury) against Defendant C and D, the above court’s order 2016 High Court Order 349 High Court Order 349 High Court Order 4 located in the Dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

사실은 2015. 9. 19. 09:00 경 하남시 E 소재 주차장에서 C는 주먹으로 F의 얼굴을 1회 때리고 발을 걸어 넘어뜨린 후 넘어진 F의 머리 부분을 3회 가량 걷어찼고, D은 위 C의 폭행을 피하기 위해 자신의 뒤로 오던

F의 머리 부위를 발로 1회 찼으며, 그로 인하여 위 F은 약 30일 간의 치료를 요하는 치아 완전 탈구 등의 상해를 입은 사실이 있었다.

Nevertheless, the prosecutor's "it is essential that the defendant F was at the time of the process."

On the other hand, it is necessary to do so when Defendant D also F.

In relation to the question "," the witness did not appear to have continued to be attached to the defendant D's side.

”라고 대답하고, “ 피해자는 ‘ 맞다가 넘어졌고, 맞다가 밀려서 D의 뒤로 가니까 D이 머리를 발로 찼다.

【Written Defendant 1, 2, and 3, 2, 3, and 3.

There is no example or fact to the question “I”.

The answer is called “,” and is required to determine whether the witness has not been a witness.

In addition, whether there is no fact or not.

In relation to the question "," "I have continued to be attached to Defendant D's side, and do not have any review."

“The answer is that “the memory is not known and is not clearly known.”

The answer was made to the question, “I am for example,” “I am for.”

In this respect, the defendant made a false statement contrary to memory, thereby committing perjury.

2. Determination

A. Perjury is established when a witness who has taken an oath under law makes a statement contrary to his/her memory, and such statement does not conform to objective facts.

Even the witness memory.