logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.08 2014가단5330506
소유권확인
Text

1. It is confirmed that the land size of B 1,481 square meters is owned by the Plaintiff in Jinju-si;

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The cadastral source map, which is the basic data of the land survey division drafted under the former Land Survey Order of the Korea Land Survey Division, is indicated as D as the owner of approximately 1,406 square meters, Jin-gun, Jin-gun, Jin-gun (hereinafter “instant land”). On July 1, 1913, the old land survey book, written on the basis of the land survey book, is indicated as the transfer of ownership to G residing in the F at the same time as the ownership preservation on March 18, 1936, after the address of the said D was changed from E to F. The land assessment book was written on July 1, 1913.

B. The instant land partitioned in the instant land was divided into two hundred and seventy-five square meters before J, Jin-gun, Jin-gun, Jin-gun, and forty forty-eight square meters before J (hereinafter “instant land”). On March 18, 1936, the land cadastre of the instant land was written D in the owner’s name column as the cause of change in ownership preservation on March 18, 1936.

C. The instant land in relation to land registration is unregistered.

The Plaintiff’s status D (hereinafter “the deceased”) died, K solely inherited the deceased’s property, who is the heir of the son’s family, and the above K died on September 5, 1947, and G solely succeeded to the above K’s property. The above G died on July 20, 1950, and the son’s family heir inherited the above G’s property. The Plaintiff, who is the heir of the son’s family, was inherited by the Plaintiff solely received the above G’s property.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence No. 1-1, 2, A2-1 through 3, A3-1, 2, A4-1, 2, A5-1, 2, A7-1, 2, A7-2, A8-1, 2, and 2-9-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The following circumstances, which can be acknowledged in the above facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim based on the overall purport of the statements and arguments set forth in subparagraphs A6-1 and 2, are the same as the name of the title holder and the deceased, and the name of the title holder and the deceased are the same as that of the former land cadastre.

arrow