beta
Text
1. The defendant shall attach to the plaintiff the annexed sheet No. 2 as to the land listed in the annexed sheet No. 1.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. In the Land Survey Book drawn up during the Japanese occupation point period, the land Survey Book is written as being written by the F resident in each E on March 29, 1912 with respect to No. 141 and No. 104, Mar. 28, 1912 (No. 45) with respect to No. 3. 28, 1912, and No. 1,128.
(hereinafter referred to as “assessment land”) b.
The official cadastral record on the land of assessment was extinguished by Korean War, and was divided into each land listed in attached Table 1, following the change of the name of the administrative district.
1) B, around March 23, 1956, G large 119 square meters and H large 22 square meters were recovered in installments. The said G large 393 square meters (119 square meters unit conversion) was divided into G large 330 square meters and I large 63 square meters on December 19, 1989. From G large 393 square meters to G large 393 square meters on June 8, 1999, J large 39 square meters was divided into 39 square meters. The above H’s old land cadastre was written as a road, and was converted into 3 square meters on April 1, 197 and converted into 193 square meters on February 10, 1978, and the above C, which was converted into 104 square meters on April 13, 1978.
C. The Defendant completed each registration of ownership preservation as to each of the lands listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “each of the lands of this case”) listed in the separate sheet No. 2.
The plaintiff's fleet M died on June 8, 1935 and succeeded to his property by the head of Seongdong-gu, the family heir.O transferred his permanent domicile on June 5, 1964 to Seongdong-gu, Seoul, but died on December 12, 1980 and jointly succeeded to Q, R, S, and T and son's family heir who died on his property.
[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap 1 through 8 (including paper numbers), the purpose of the entire pleading
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The plaintiff asserted that each of the lands of this case was first acquired under the circumstances of the plaintiff's fleet M, and thereafter, the plaintiff died after theO was solely inherited.