1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The grounds for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case, such as accepting the judgment of the court of first instance, are as follows, and the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the part on the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to making an additional decision as to the assertion by this court, as set forth in the following two, and thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8(2)

5 The 5th page "6 Certificate" shall be raised with "6, 7 Certificate".

The 5th five parallels "the fact that the business registration has been closed" are "the fact that the business registration has been reported for the closure of the business."

5 The term "protective" of 14 parallels shall be read as "protective".

5 Under the 5 side, the term “maintenance” shall be maintained and managed as “maintenance”.

6 The 6th three parallels of “after closing the business registration” shall be deemed to read “after filing a report on the closure of the business registration.”

6. At the right side of “not only” but also “no one has conducted self-quality control or recorded and preserved relevant documents from the reporting of closure of business on the business registration to October 2016,” respectively.

7 At the right side of “in comprehensive,” the following is added: “Around November 2015, the Defendant has conducted a confirmation and inspection of quality control in 2016 at the time when one year has not passed since it had already been verified and inspected for quality control in 2015; based on such fact, the Defendant took the instant disposition; and even if considering the description of “A” evidence submitted by the Plaintiff in addition to this Court.

7 The following shall be added to the right side of "......................"

In addition, even if there is room to view the instant disposition as a deviation from or abuse of discretionary power as alleged by the Plaintiff, in the administrative litigation that claims the invalidity of the administrative disposition and seeks the invalidity confirmation (not seeking the revocation of the instant disposition with respect to the request for the seat of this court, but making it clear that the Plaintiff seeks the invalidity confirmation only).