logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원고등법원 2021.02.04 2019나22131
물품대금
Text

All appeals filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and the counterclaim claim filed by this court are dismissed.

Appeal costs and anti-actions.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and the defendant's new arguments and counterclaim claims are as follows, except for those newly determined by this court in paragraphs 2 and 3 (the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act). 3. 4 3. and 9 9 . "1,500 ........." are all "1,500 ........"

4 Under the 4th page, “Evidence Nos. 5, 7, 9, and 11 (including a number; hereinafter the same shall apply)” is added to the “founded grounds for recognition” of 3-4 conduct.

Under the 5th page, “The evidence” is as follows: “The evidence and the evidence of No. 12, 15, and 16 shall be written.”

The 6-3 to 9 parallel parts are deleted, and the 6-10 parallel parts are as follows: “(a), (b), (c), (e), and (f)” between the 6-10 parallels to the 7th parallels; “A, (b), (c), (d) and (e).”

Under the 6th page, “Istain” shall add “(hereinafter referred to as “Istain for sampling of this case”)” to the following:

7 - 6 - 7 Hashe had engaged in the business with the trade name “N” on the one hand.

H is a long-standing place of the defendant, and only submits a written confirmation to the effect that he/she had been able to use his/her credit from June 2012, with knowledge of the defendant's difficulties in the defendant's early financing of the business."

8 1-2 Pursuant to the phrase “a person who prepared or signed a 8-1-2 conduct”, the phrase “a person who prepared and signed the 8-1-2 conduct, but did not indicate at all E and F in the letter of promise to pay the price of the goods, and only written in the column “a person who confirmed” the name of the Defendant’s individual in English.

The 8-3 to 5 parallel parts are as follows.

【Notwithstanding the above circumstances, the Plaintiff concluded the instant agreement with E and F, who is not the Defendant, as the other party to the agreement.

No particular circumstance can be found.

"The facts recognized earlier" of the 9th 4 parallel action are as follows: "A evidence No. 9".

arrow