beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, for a year of imprisonment for a defendant B, and for a period of ten months of imprisonment for a defendant C, respectively.
(b).
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Justice] On December 5, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a crime of fraud, etc. at the Suwon District Court on October 2013. Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a crime of fraud, etc. at the Suwon District Court on December 5, 2013. Each of the above rulings became final and conclusive on the 13th of the same month.
【Criminal Facts】
The Defendants recruited those who are not able to receive a normal loan in the financial sphere due to low credit rating or lack of a certain occupation, and conspired to obtain profits by deceiving a lending company by forging a detailed statement of account transactions in a financial institution as if they had a normal occupation and by falsely assuming a certificate of graduation or a certificate of employment as if they had a certain wage income, and by falsely complying with the terms and conditions of credit loans of a savings bank or other lending company, and by receiving a certain ratio of the loan from the lending clients as a fee.
Accordingly, Defendant A added comments to the purport that those who wish to obtain a normal loan even if they wish to obtain a loan by accessing the Internet NAV knowledge will search and get the loan to be used. Defendant A and Defendant C applied for a loan in the name of the applicant for the above-mentioned work loan, including a copy of identification card or a certified copy of resident registration card. Defendant A and Defendant C receive a request for a loan in the name of the applicant for the work loan by forging the certificate of employment or the detailed statement of account transaction through telephone or Internet, and Defendant A received the representative telephone of the relevant company in the form of a handphone carried out by Defendant A when confirming whether the applicant for the work loan is actually in office.